- Quintessential Queensland
- Perceptions: how people understand the landscape
- From runs to closer settlement
- Geological survey of Queensland
- Mapping a new colony, 1860-80
- Mapping the Torres Strait: from TI to Magani Malu and Zenadh Kes
- Order in Paradise: a colonial gold field
- Queensland atlas, 1865
- Queensland mapping since 1900
- Queensland: the slogan state
- Rainforests of North Queensland
- Queenslanders: people in the landscape
- Aboriginal heroes: episodes in the colonial landscape
- Australian South Sea Islanders
- Cane fields and solidarity in the multiethnic north
- Colonial immigration to Queensland
- Greek Cafés in the landscape of Queensland
- Hispanics and human rights in Queensland’s public spaces
- Italians in north Queensland
- Lebanese in rural Queensland
- Queensland clothing
- Queensland for ‘the best kind of population, primary producers’
- Movement: how people move through the landscape
- Air travel in Queensland
- Bicycling through Brisbane, 1896
- Cobb & Co
- Journey to Hayman Island, 1938
- Law and story-strings
- Mobile kids: children’s explorations of Cherbourg
- Movable heritage of North Queensland
- Passages to India: military linkages with Queensland
- The Queen in Queensland, 1954
- Transient Chinese in colonial Queensland
- Travelling times by rail
- Pathways: how things move through the landscape and where they are made
- Aboriginal dreaming paths and trading ways
- Chinese traders in the nineteenth century
- Introducing the cane toad
- Pituri bag
- Press and the media
- Radio in Queensland
- The telephone in Queensland
- ‘A little bit of love for me and a murder for my old man’: the Queensland Bush Book Club
- Separation: divisions in the landscape
- Asylums in the landscape
- Brisbane River
- Changing landscape of radicalism
- Civil government boundaries
- Convict Brisbane
- Dividing Queensland - Pauline Hanson’s One Nation Party
- High water mark: the shifting electoral landscape 2001-12
- Hospitals in the landscape
- Indigenous health
- Palm Island
- Secession movements
- Separate spheres: gender and dress codes
- Separating land, separating culture
- Stone walls do a prison make: law on the landscape
- The 1967 Referendum – the State comes together?
- Utopian communities
- Whiteness in the tropics
- Conflict: how people contest the landscape
- A tale of two elections – One Nation and political protest
- Battle of Brisbane – Australian masculinity under threat
- Dangerous spaces - youth politics in Brisbane, 1960s-70s
- Fortress Queensland 1942-45
- Grassy hills: colonial defence and coastal forts
- Great Shearers’ Strike of 1891
- Iwasaki project
- Johannes Bjelke-Petersen: straddling a barbed wire fence
- Mount Etna: Queensland's longest environmental conflict
- Native Police
- Skyrail Cairns
- Staunch but conservative – the trade union movement in Rockhampton
- The Chinese question
- Thomas Wentworth Wills and Cullin-la-ringo Station
- Imagination: how people have imagined Queensland
- Brisbane River and Moreton Bay: Thomas Welsby
- Changing views of the Glasshouse Mountains
- Imagining Queensland in film and television production
- Literary mapping of Brisbane in the 1990s
- Looking at Mount Coot-tha
- Mapping the Macqueen farm
- Mapping the mythic: Hugh Sawrey's ‘outback’
- People’s Republic of Woodford
- The Pineapple Girl
- The writers of Tamborine Mountain
- Vance and Nettie Palmer
- Memory: how people remember the landscape
- Anna Wickham: the memory of a moment
- Berajondo and Mill Point: remembering place and landscape
- Cemeteries in the landscape
- Landscapes of memory: Tjapukai Dance Theatre and Laura Festival
- Out where the dead towns lie
- Queensland in miniature: the Brisbane Exhibition
- Roadside ++++ memorials
- Shipwrecks as graves
- The Dame in the tropics: Nellie Melba
- Vanished heritage
- War memorials
- Curiosity: knowledge through the landscape
- A playground for science: Great Barrier Reef
- Duboisia hopwoodii: a colonial curiosity
- Great Artesian Basin: water from deeper down
- In search of Landsborough
- James Cook’s hundred days in Queensland
- Mutual curiosity – Aboriginal people and explorers
- Queensland Acclimatisation Society
- Queensland’s own sea monster: a curious tale of loss and regret
- St Lucia: degrees of landscape
- Transformation: how the landscape has changed and been modified
- Kill, cure, or strangle: Atherton Tablelands
- National parks in Queensland
- Pastoralism 1860s–1915
- Prickly pear
- Repurchasing estates: the transformation of Durundur
- Sunshine Coast
- The Brigalow
- Walter Reid Cultural Centre, Rockhampton: back again
- Pleasure: how people enjoy the landscape
- Bushwalking in Queensland
- Cherbourg that’s my home: celebrating landscape through song
- Creating rural attractions
- Queer pleasure: masculinity, male homosexuality and public space
- Railway refreshment rooms
- Regional cinema
- Schoolies week: a festival of misrule
- The sporting landscape
- Visiting the Great Barrier Reef
On the voyage of the Endeavour in 1770 the term ‘Labyrinth’ was used to describe the innumerable coral cays, reefs and shoals that challenged the navigational skills of Captain James Cook as he sailed along the northeast coast of Australia. The navigational puzzle took centuries to resolve through survey and mapping, but the complex intricacy of life below the surface remains a scientific curiosity.
Colonial exploration of the New World was accompanied by an emerging European interest in natural science, and this quest for knowledge characterised the voyage of the Endeavour. Botanist Joseph Banks observed a great variety of coral and fish species in the seas. During later nineteenth century navigational voyages the underwater life of the Great Barrier Reef became a focus of scientific interest, and within a century the region became one of the most expansive marine science enterprises in the world.
The European exploration of coral seas piqued interest in the origin of coral reefs and geologists sought to explain what they saw as rock emerging from the ocean beds. While early theories pondered the question of origin, naturalists accompanying navigators at the Great Barrier Reef began to realise the surprisingly colourful and varied life contained within. In 1847 naturalist Thomas Jukes aboard The Fly glimpsed the ‘full life and luxuriance’ of the corals while at anchor. He described the unrivalled colour and form of corals and fishes. These have become an enduring source of curiosity for scientists and visitors alike.
Observations of Reef life were somewhat incidental to British colonial consolidation. Global navigation was primarily driven by a desire to acquire resources, and scientific knowledge of the Great Barrier Reef was similarly motivated. William Saville-Kent was foremost in researching the Reef as a rich and varied resource.
Saville-Kent was appointed Inspector of Queensland Fisheries in 1889 to investigate the dramatic decline in pearl shell. His curiosity in Reef corals, which dated to his time as curator at the British Museum, was quickly rekindled in the field. His study of coral reefs resulted in the landmark 1893 publication The Great Barrier Reef of Australia: its products and potentialities. As its title suggests, Saville-Kent focused on unique and abundant marine resources that might be used for colonial industries and products.
It had a more enduring effect. With its striking black and white photographs and hand-coloured plates of corals and fishes, the book became a baseline for scientific research. The publication and its fine illustrations instigated a global curiosity in the Reef.
The highpoint of scientific research in the early twentieth century was the British Expedition of 1928-29 to Low Isles. The Expedition was reported internationally, and created great excitement in Australia and Britain. The Melbourne Argus reported on 13 December 1927 that ‘The expedition had aroused more interest than any other topic at meetings of scientific societies in Britain’.
The expedition comprised a team of talented young scientists led by Charles Yonge. Ten people, including three women (Anne Stephenson, Gweneth Russell and Martha Yonge) left London in May 1928. Dr Martha Yonge, the ‘charming young wife’ of Maurice Yonge, served as medical officer to the expedition. They were later joined by Sidnie Manton, zoologist and Elizabeth Fraser, Senior Lecturer in Zoology, University of London. After leaving London in May 1928, they arrived in Brisbane in July and then travelled for two and a half days by rail to Cairns; and a further five hours to reach the Low Isles by launch. At the height of activity there were twenty-three scientists on Low Isles including five scientists from the Australian Museum and additional British scientists who joined the party for shorter periods. Several Aboriginal labourers from Yarrabah and a cook and domestic servant provided additional support to the expedition.
Like Saville-Kent before them, they focused on identifying resources for potential exploitation, returning to a scientific method based on direct field based observation. The core group remained on the island for a year immersed in the wonders of the Reef. The scientists came to know the environments through all seasons, and transformed these small coral cays into meaningful landscapes. Yonge later observed,
...the little sand cay on which we lived and which we grew to know so intimately – every tree and every bush; I would say, every grain of sand – during the year that followed...
Carefully planned, the expedition included the construction of the first purpose built research facilities on the Reef. The scientists thus wrought changes to the physical landscape. Nevertheless the facilities were rudimentary. Separate sleeping quarters were available for men and women, but some, including those from the Australian Museum, camped in tents. Exposed to the elements and working in open laboratories the environment had a reciprocal impact on the biologists.
[A]s men of flesh and blood they sank slowly into a sort of melting decay under the savage heat of a humid summer. About 9 o’clock in the morning one begins to feel on Low Island as though one’s spine is being slowly boiled away.
And their work was sometimes destroyed or interrupted by insects, as reported in the Sydney Morning Herald, 29 November 1928,
when somebody did at last manage to develop some photographic plates, an operation the heat makes almost impossible, and put them up to dry, the ants came and chewed off the emulsion.
Despite many discomforts Yonge recalled that ‘the genuine thrill of investigating and living amongst animals of which we had read so much but had never expected to see’ kept scientists enthralled and motivated. According to the Sydney Morning Herald,
Twenty scientists are living on that island for a year. It is not a rest cure by any means. But there are such a lot of delightful things to be collected in the place that they put up with the inconvenience.
Yonge wrote in 1930,
Each pool has an exquisitely beautiful population of tiny coral fish, which for their adequate description need the knowledge of an ichthyologist, the imagery of a poet and the brush of an artist...
The scientific discoveries of the British Expedition were well publicised. One of the first visitors to the Low Isles was journalist Charles Barrett whose newspaper articles were later published as a book. Other scientists from the expedition, including TC Roughley and C. Yonge, also published popular scientific accounts of the Reef.
Holidaymakers were encouraged to satisfy their own scientific curiosity. The five Australian scientists from the Australian Museum (Whitely, Boardman, Iredale, Livingston and McNeill) who supported the Yonge Expedition were key participants in other Reef excursions that catered to holidaymakers. Organised by Mont Embury, these trips to the Whitsundays opened scientific discovery to professionals and amateurs alike. Scientists and holidaymakers fossicked side-by-side on exposed reefs and amassed extensive collections of shells and corals. As the journalist ‘Wampoa’ wrote in Bank Notes, August 1930,
you may stand there every day for two hours on the edge of such a pool gazing through a water telescope and at the end of a month’s sojourn among them all find your ‘insatiable curiosity’ is still an ‘insatiable curiosity’.
Massive numbers of shells and coral specimens were made for Museum and private collections. By 1966 the Prime Minister’s Department reported that Low Isles had been ‘virtually swept clean’.
James Bowen, and Margarita Bowen, The Great Barrier Reef: history, science, heritage, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002
William Saville-Kent, The Great Barrier Reef of Australia: its products and potentialities: containing an account, with copious coloured and photographic illustrations (the latter here produced for the first time), of the corals and coral reefs, pearl and pearl-shell, beche-de-mer, other fishing industries, and the marine fauna of the Australian Great Barrier Region, London, Allen, 1893
C. M. Yonge, A year on the Great Barrier Reef: the story of corals & of the greatest of their creations, London, Putnam, 1930
Date created:15 October 2010
Copyright © Celmara Pocock, 2010
On the bottom the diver was engaged on whatever task he had before him. ... Fish, usually so elusive, are caught, surprisingly, unaware. They swim around regardless of this intruding member of the land fauna. Coral cod, parrot fish, an occasional fire fish perhaps, and a host of minute, brilliantly coloured species which live among the branches of the coral – all are there. Some, mildly curious, gaze into the window of the helmet, and a member of the expedition was one day surprised to find her entire line of vision obscured by the face of a great fish, probably a groper.
C.M. Yonge, A year on the Great Barrier Reef: the story of corals & of the greatest of their creations, London, Putnam, 1930