The Brisbane River floods. In the extreme episodes of natural disasters a boatload of stories flow from the mouths of people to comprehend their landscape.

Proposed flood diversion canal cross sections, 1896

10 June 1896
15 April 2015
15 April 2015

Collection of the Fryer Library, University of Queensland

Proposed flood diversion canal cross section, 1896. After the ‘Great Flood’ of February 1893, the Water Supply Department and its director, J.B. Henderson, investigated the possibility of building flood diversion canals to protect the city. This cross section map shows one canal leaving from Oxley and the other leaving from Yeronga, both with a common outlet at Tingalpa Creek at the ocean. This map shows that the maximum depth of cutting for the upper canal would be approximately 252 feet and, for a length of around 8.5 miles, the average depth would be about 120 feet. For the lower canal, the maximum cutting depth would be about 170 feet while for a length of around six miles the average depth would be 100 feet. According to Henderson’s report, both canals would have ‘colossal dimensions’ and rival some of the largest canals in the world. As shown by another map depicting the proposal, either canal would require purchasing land between the Brisbane River and Moreton Bay. The canals would also require the construction of several new rail and road bridges, revetting to protect embankments, and finally an inlet weir. According to Henderson’s calculations, the excavation alone would cost £9,523,194 for the upper canal, and about £7,138,000 for the lower canal. In addition to affecting navigability and tidal behaviour of the Brisbane River, the canals would need frequent dredging. Henderson advised parliament to abandon consideration of this and other similar schemes. Queensland votes and proceedings, vol.4, 1896

Proposed diversion canal scheme, 1896

Australia
10 June 1896
15 April 2015
15 April 2015

Location

Australia
Water Supply Department

Collection of the Fryer Library, University of Queensland

Proposed flood diversion canal scheme, 1896. Under J.B. Henderson’s direction, the Water Supply Department investigated a variety of flood mitigation schemes to protect Brisbane from future floods. A report was presented to Parliament in 1896 and included this map of two flood diversion canals. According to Henderson, at the time there appeared to be a ‘prevailing belief  ̶  that without difficulty a canal could be formed at some point on the river to the sea by means of which floods below the canal entrance at the river end would be wholly averted.’ However, building them would not be simple. Either canal would involve the purchase of much land, the construction of several new bridges, revetting to protect embankments, and finally an inlet weir. According to Henderson’s calculations, the excavation alone would cost £9,523,194 for the upper Oxley canal, shown in orange, and about £7,138,000 for the lower Yeronga canal shown in light blue. In addition to affecting navigability and tidal behaviour of the Brisbane River, the canals would need frequent dredging. Henderson advised parliament to abandon consideration of this and other similar schemes. Queensland votes and proceedings, vol.4, 1896

Channel widening and river training scheme, 1896

1 January 1896
15 April 2015
15 April 2015
Water Supply Department

Collection of the Fryer Library, University of Queensland

Channel widening and river training scheme, 1896. Under the direction J.B Henderson, this channel widening and river training scheme was proposed by the Water Supply Department in 1896. To prevent a repeat of the disastrous 1893 floods, areas shaded orange would be removed to widen the channel. A series of flood walls would also be built to protect the inner city and South Brisbane. Where the walls would abut existing permanent structures, watertight joints would be formed keeping flood waters in the channel. These walls would have gates at key locations only closed in the event of a flood higher than in 1890. In the city, flood gates were proposed on the corner of Creek and Charlotte streets and on the corner of Alice and Edward Streets. In South Brisbane, flood gates were proposed at the end of Russell, Glenelg, Ernest and Tribune streets. This map includes the 1893 flood line and shows only part of the Victoria Bridge which was destroyed during the flood. Queensland votes and proceedings, vol.4, 1896

Brisbane flood, right bank, 1893

1 January 1893
15 April 2015
15 April 2015
Survey Office

Collection of the Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying 

10 chains to an inch

Brisbane flood, right bank, 1893. Produced by the Survey Office, this map shows the extent of the 1893 flood on the right bank of the river through West End and South Brisbane. Drawn on existing sheet maps, only one side of the river is shown. Field staff had responsibility for surveying different parts of the city from which a single map could be compiled. This map was stamped by the Survey General’s Office 3 May 1893.

Brisbane flood, left bank, 1893

1 January 1893
15 April 2015
15 April 2015
Survey Office

Collection of the Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying 

10 chains to an inch

Brisbane flood, left bank, 1893. Produced by the Survey Office, this map shows the extent of the ‘Great Flood’ of February 1893 on the left bank of the Brisbane River through St Lucia, Toowong, Taringa and Auchenflower. Drawn over an existing sheet map of Brisbane, only one side of the river is shown. Field staff surveyed the city one section at a time from which a single map could be compiled. This map is signed by the staff surveyor ‘Mr Bedford’ and dated 25 March 1893. Collection of the Museum of Lands, Mapping and Surveying 

Built around a tidal river, some 20 km from Moreton Bay, Brisbane often floods, usually in conjunction with La Niña events bringing heavy wet conditions and cyclonic activity across the state.

Photographs of the Brisbane River during the 1893 flood. Collection of Fryer Library, University of Queensland.

Copyright © Collection of the Fryer Library, the University of Queensland

The Brisbane River divides Queensland’s capital city and threads its way through the suburbs and into its hinterland.

Syndicate content